<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Welcome to the Mad Tea Party</title>
	<atom:link href="http://newmoderate.com/2010/02/05/welcome-to-the-mad-tea-party/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://newmoderate.com/2010/02/05/welcome-to-the-mad-tea-party/</link>
	<description>POLITICS &#38; CIVILIZATION FOR THE PASSIONATE CENTRIST</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 May 2012 02:28:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: valdobiade</title>
		<link>http://newmoderate.com/2010/02/05/welcome-to-the-mad-tea-party/#comment-811</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[valdobiade]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 17:42:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newmoderate.com/?p=814#comment-811</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hallie, I did not compare Bush with Hitler on how many people died in their wars, but on the arrogance of starting a war. Regarding the alliance with other countries, to start and keep a war, Bush was worse than Hitler. This was my point.

TK, there were some hundreds of thousand Iraqi and Afghans killed, but who cares? All are terrorists as long as they are not Christians. Remember? Bush started a Crusade too, beside the quest for oil (masked under &quot;spreading democracy&quot; tactic)

Priscilla, as Hallie said to me &quot;you&#039;re probably being &#039;tongue and cheek&#039;&quot; when you compare Obama with Stalin. Stalin needed about 10 years to became what he became. Obama had no more than 1 year when Hitler-Stalin comparisons hysteria started.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hallie, I did not compare Bush with Hitler on how many people died in their wars, but on the arrogance of starting a war. Regarding the alliance with other countries, to start and keep a war, Bush was worse than Hitler. This was my point.</p>
<p>TK, there were some hundreds of thousand Iraqi and Afghans killed, but who cares? All are terrorists as long as they are not Christians. Remember? Bush started a Crusade too, beside the quest for oil (masked under &#8220;spreading democracy&#8221; tactic)</p>
<p>Priscilla, as Hallie said to me &#8220;you&#8217;re probably being &#8216;tongue and cheek&#8217;&#8221; when you compare Obama with Stalin. Stalin needed about 10 years to became what he became. Obama had no more than 1 year when Hitler-Stalin comparisons hysteria started.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TK</title>
		<link>http://newmoderate.com/2010/02/05/welcome-to-the-mad-tea-party/#comment-809</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[TK]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 06:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newmoderate.com/?p=814#comment-809</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Priscilla: Bush got 3,000 Americans killed when he invaded Iraq for piss-poor reasons, and when Bush took office, he went on vacation. He didn&#039;t really lead the country, merely let it degrade into the current situation. Note,  the Texas oil companies he used to work for failed, and as Texas governor, he promoted gay-bashing, and declared an actual &quot;Jesus Day&quot; . But I do agree that the reluctant (bought and paid for) Dems have stalled the healthcare debate, in conjunction to their nearly identical Republican counterparts. The Dems are being bipartisan, they&#039;re joing the Republicans in inaction.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Priscilla: Bush got 3,000 Americans killed when he invaded Iraq for piss-poor reasons, and when Bush took office, he went on vacation. He didn&#8217;t really lead the country, merely let it degrade into the current situation. Note,  the Texas oil companies he used to work for failed, and as Texas governor, he promoted gay-bashing, and declared an actual &#8220;Jesus Day&#8221; . But I do agree that the reluctant (bought and paid for) Dems have stalled the healthcare debate, in conjunction to their nearly identical Republican counterparts. The Dems are being bipartisan, they&#8217;re joing the Republicans in inaction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Priscilla</title>
		<link>http://newmoderate.com/2010/02/05/welcome-to-the-mad-tea-party/#comment-808</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Priscilla]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 00:18:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newmoderate.com/?p=814#comment-808</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Whew...we&#039;re veering away from moderate viewpoints a little here, wouldn&#039;t you say?

I agree with Hallie - there can be no serious discussion as long as we throwing accusations of Nazism around.

And since when did Bush kill 3,000 Americans? Are we getting into Trutherism now?   That is also not a serious debate.

And I don&#039;t think that Bush ever hypnotized any Democrat, lol.  I do think that he was a capable and experienced executive when he took office and knew how to help shepherd bipartisan legislation through Congress - think NCLB (essentially Ted Kennedy&#039;s bill, tweaked to get GOP support), Medicare Rx drug coverage, campaign finance reform .    I think it is fair to say that Obama has not shown much ability to lead, and has allowed the idealogues in his party to run the show, which is why he is flailing. Maybe he is an idealogue too, maybe not, I&#039;m not sure.  But he&#039;s not a good executive right now.  I hope that changes.

And, come on,  Dems only lost their filibuster proof majority in Jan of 2010.  The healthcare bill was introduced back in May 2009....came out of committee in June.  The GOP has introduced  its own bill twice (the second about 2 weeks ago, by Rep Paul Ryan), but it has never been allowed out of committee, nor have any Republicans been invited to  negotiations sonce August.  It has not been the Repubs keeping the bill from passing, it has been reluctant Dems. 

I&#039;m kind of a wonk on this stuff, I know - sorry.  But there are good congressmen on both sides of the aisle who want to do this right.  The aforementioned Paul Ryan on the GOP side, Ron Wyden on the Dem side.....and there are others.   I think if more people could hear about their ideas, there would be some real hope instead of anger over all this bs.........]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whew&#8230;we&#8217;re veering away from moderate viewpoints a little here, wouldn&#8217;t you say?</p>
<p>I agree with Hallie &#8211; there can be no serious discussion as long as we throwing accusations of Nazism around.</p>
<p>And since when did Bush kill 3,000 Americans? Are we getting into Trutherism now?   That is also not a serious debate.</p>
<p>And I don&#8217;t think that Bush ever hypnotized any Democrat, lol.  I do think that he was a capable and experienced executive when he took office and knew how to help shepherd bipartisan legislation through Congress &#8211; think NCLB (essentially Ted Kennedy&#8217;s bill, tweaked to get GOP support), Medicare Rx drug coverage, campaign finance reform .    I think it is fair to say that Obama has not shown much ability to lead, and has allowed the idealogues in his party to run the show, which is why he is flailing. Maybe he is an idealogue too, maybe not, I&#8217;m not sure.  But he&#8217;s not a good executive right now.  I hope that changes.</p>
<p>And, come on,  Dems only lost their filibuster proof majority in Jan of 2010.  The healthcare bill was introduced back in May 2009&#8230;.came out of committee in June.  The GOP has introduced  its own bill twice (the second about 2 weeks ago, by Rep Paul Ryan), but it has never been allowed out of committee, nor have any Republicans been invited to  negotiations sonce August.  It has not been the Repubs keeping the bill from passing, it has been reluctant Dems. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m kind of a wonk on this stuff, I know &#8211; sorry.  But there are good congressmen on both sides of the aisle who want to do this right.  The aforementioned Paul Ryan on the GOP side, Ron Wyden on the Dem side&#8230;..and there are others.   I think if more people could hear about their ideas, there would be some real hope instead of anger over all this bs&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hallie</title>
		<link>http://newmoderate.com/2010/02/05/welcome-to-the-mad-tea-party/#comment-807</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hallie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 23:12:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newmoderate.com/?p=814#comment-807</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[TK: I never said it was a good idea to invade Iraq.  I remember watching the first images of the tanks rolling through the desert and saying, &quot;oh man, this is gonna be a cluster.&quot; I just think it disingenuous, especially in a discussion about what&#039;s wrong with partisan politics to liken Hitler to Bush.  So, as long as we are going to take that route:

Valdo: I wouldn&#039;t call Obama a Nazi... if anything, I&#039;d call him Stalin... ;0)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TK: I never said it was a good idea to invade Iraq.  I remember watching the first images of the tanks rolling through the desert and saying, &#8220;oh man, this is gonna be a cluster.&#8221; I just think it disingenuous, especially in a discussion about what&#8217;s wrong with partisan politics to liken Hitler to Bush.  So, as long as we are going to take that route:</p>
<p>Valdo: I wouldn&#8217;t call Obama a Nazi&#8230; if anything, I&#8217;d call him Stalin&#8230; ;0)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TK</title>
		<link>http://newmoderate.com/2010/02/05/welcome-to-the-mad-tea-party/#comment-806</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[TK]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 21:58:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newmoderate.com/?p=814#comment-806</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Valdo: I think the &quot;51st state&quot; is secceding, they are demanding  unAmerican things now, like answers from their leaders and ours. I wish them luck.

Hallie: Hitler started WWII, and that killed ~50 million people worlswide, on purpose. Bush started the war in Iraq, and incidentally killed 3,000 Americans, I don&#039;t know how many Iraqis... the World economy, American credibility, and reason.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Valdo: I think the &#8220;51st state&#8221; is secceding, they are demanding  unAmerican things now, like answers from their leaders and ours. I wish them luck.</p>
<p>Hallie: Hitler started WWII, and that killed ~50 million people worlswide, on purpose. Bush started the war in Iraq, and incidentally killed 3,000 Americans, I don&#8217;t know how many Iraqis&#8230; the World economy, American credibility, and reason.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TK</title>
		<link>http://newmoderate.com/2010/02/05/welcome-to-the-mad-tea-party/#comment-805</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[TK]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 21:49:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newmoderate.com/?p=814#comment-805</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And people LIKE Obama too...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And people LIKE Obama too&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hallie</title>
		<link>http://newmoderate.com/2010/02/05/welcome-to-the-mad-tea-party/#comment-804</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hallie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 21:39:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newmoderate.com/?p=814#comment-804</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[OK Valdo, I realize you&#039;re probably being &quot;tongue and cheek&quot; when you say Bush was worse than Hilter.  At least I hope you are.  But, I think this site is suppose to be reserved for &quot;honest&quot; debate.  I wouldn&#039;t equate the systematic murder of 13 million Jews, POW&#039;s, Polish Catholics, Serbians, gypsies, politcal desenters, and homosexuals, with invading Iraq (even if the goal was &quot;for oil,&quot; which I don&#039;t think it was.)  Bush, and the country was still reeling from the murder of 3,000  American citizens, and I think he was concerned about his legacy.  He seriously believed he could fight and beat Islamic terrorists.  And the US did have allies when it went into Iraq, which I wouldn&#039;t equate with Hilters main ally Mussolini.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK Valdo, I realize you&#8217;re probably being &#8220;tongue and cheek&#8221; when you say Bush was worse than Hilter.  At least I hope you are.  But, I think this site is suppose to be reserved for &#8220;honest&#8221; debate.  I wouldn&#8217;t equate the systematic murder of 13 million Jews, POW&#8217;s, Polish Catholics, Serbians, gypsies, politcal desenters, and homosexuals, with invading Iraq (even if the goal was &#8220;for oil,&#8221; which I don&#8217;t think it was.)  Bush, and the country was still reeling from the murder of 3,000  American citizens, and I think he was concerned about his legacy.  He seriously believed he could fight and beat Islamic terrorists.  And the US did have allies when it went into Iraq, which I wouldn&#8217;t equate with Hilters main ally Mussolini.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: valdobiade</title>
		<link>http://newmoderate.com/2010/02/05/welcome-to-the-mad-tea-party/#comment-803</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[valdobiade]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 19:44:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newmoderate.com/?p=814#comment-803</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Priscilla and Hallie, I called Bush a Nazi not from the &quot;internal&quot; point of view. Indeed, Democrats and Republicans alike voted for the war(s). And as Rick very well said: &quot;I have to give Bush credit for his ability to hypnotize Democrats into passing legislation that only a right-wing Republican could love. The war in Iraq? The Patriot Act? Good grief, how did he do it?&quot;

I called Bush a Nazi from the &quot;external&quot; point of view. From the world view, if you want. I can say that Bush was even worse than Hitler. At least Hitler got allies when he started the second world war.
Except Great Britain, that is the 51st US state (snide), who else *really* wanted to go in war for oil?

Hallie, if US controls the oil (that was the actual purpose of invading Iraq), US controls the world, as Hitler wanted. For all I know, Saddam (a president installed by the US), started to deliver oil to the the countries that US despise. What is the &quot;normal&quot; US reaction? An unilateral war with the Congress approval, but that doesn&#039;t make Bush less Nazi in my point of view.

Now I wold like to know why Obama is called Nazi... not that I like Obama, but just for a discussion...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Priscilla and Hallie, I called Bush a Nazi not from the &#8220;internal&#8221; point of view. Indeed, Democrats and Republicans alike voted for the war(s). And as Rick very well said: &#8220;I have to give Bush credit for his ability to hypnotize Democrats into passing legislation that only a right-wing Republican could love. The war in Iraq? The Patriot Act? Good grief, how did he do it?&#8221;</p>
<p>I called Bush a Nazi from the &#8220;external&#8221; point of view. From the world view, if you want. I can say that Bush was even worse than Hitler. At least Hitler got allies when he started the second world war.<br />
Except Great Britain, that is the 51st US state (snide), who else *really* wanted to go in war for oil?</p>
<p>Hallie, if US controls the oil (that was the actual purpose of invading Iraq), US controls the world, as Hitler wanted. For all I know, Saddam (a president installed by the US), started to deliver oil to the the countries that US despise. What is the &#8220;normal&#8221; US reaction? An unilateral war with the Congress approval, but that doesn&#8217;t make Bush less Nazi in my point of view.</p>
<p>Now I wold like to know why Obama is called Nazi&#8230; not that I like Obama, but just for a discussion&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick Bayan</title>
		<link>http://newmoderate.com/2010/02/05/welcome-to-the-mad-tea-party/#comment-802</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rick Bayan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 16:07:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newmoderate.com/?p=814#comment-802</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[TK: I have to give Bush credit for his ability to hypnotize Democrats into passing legislation that only a right-wing Republican could love. The war in Iraq? The Patriot Act? Good grief, how did he do it? And Obama can&#039;t even get support for a public healthcare option.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TK: I have to give Bush credit for his ability to hypnotize Democrats into passing legislation that only a right-wing Republican could love. The war in Iraq? The Patriot Act? Good grief, how did he do it? And Obama can&#8217;t even get support for a public healthcare option.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick Bayan</title>
		<link>http://newmoderate.com/2010/02/05/welcome-to-the-mad-tea-party/#comment-801</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rick Bayan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 16:02:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newmoderate.com/?p=814#comment-801</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Priscilla: The Democrats clearly have the majority, but they no longer have enough votes to prevent Republican filibusters. With the exception of Olympia Snowe and the two others you mentioned (I didn&#039;t know about them voting with the Democrats), the Republicans are pretty much a solid anti-Obama bloc. 

When it comes to healthcare, I still think we need a public option as a choice -- sick people need coverage, and it&#039;s not right to force private insurers to carry the burden of insuring high-risk individuals (how&#039;s that for a Republican argument in favor of public health insurance?). If we do force private insurers to take on high-risk clients, they&#039;ll be charging exorbitant premiums, which is also counterproductive. 

Anyway, back to your comment... I didn&#039;t know about the Democrats who were coerced into going along with the healthcare bill. Any form of coercion is wrong, of course. (And it seems to be a liberal/Democrat trait.) But that doesn&#039;t excuse the Republicans from their duty to pass needed legislation. Instead, they&#039;re simply crossing their arms, hunkering down and refusing to cooperate. I think it&#039;s reached the point where they&#039;ll do anything to make Obama look ineffective. And to me, that&#039;s hyperpartisanship.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Priscilla: The Democrats clearly have the majority, but they no longer have enough votes to prevent Republican filibusters. With the exception of Olympia Snowe and the two others you mentioned (I didn&#8217;t know about them voting with the Democrats), the Republicans are pretty much a solid anti-Obama bloc. </p>
<p>When it comes to healthcare, I still think we need a public option as a choice &#8212; sick people need coverage, and it&#8217;s not right to force private insurers to carry the burden of insuring high-risk individuals (how&#8217;s that for a Republican argument in favor of public health insurance?). If we do force private insurers to take on high-risk clients, they&#8217;ll be charging exorbitant premiums, which is also counterproductive. </p>
<p>Anyway, back to your comment&#8230; I didn&#8217;t know about the Democrats who were coerced into going along with the healthcare bill. Any form of coercion is wrong, of course. (And it seems to be a liberal/Democrat trait.) But that doesn&#8217;t excuse the Republicans from their duty to pass needed legislation. Instead, they&#8217;re simply crossing their arms, hunkering down and refusing to cooperate. I think it&#8217;s reached the point where they&#8217;ll do anything to make Obama look ineffective. And to me, that&#8217;s hyperpartisanship.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

